The issue, as I've articulated it, is that to trade a bill for a study is somewhat disappointing, because, as I said, I've been here for 17 years and this issue, frankly, has been studied to death. I'd be interested in actually knowing that the Canadian Bar Association decided that this should be studied. They wouldn't advocate for an amendment to the Criminal Code if, in fact, there wasn't some inconsistency in the application of sentencing principles across the country, and that would have been the core success of your bill, that a judge would have had specific direction from the Parliament of Canada that FAS is to be a mitigating factor in sentencing. Frankly, that would have been huge.
It's a pity to sort of walk away from that opportunity, especially in the context of a majority government.