Thank you very much, Mr. Rankin.
I have a question to follow up on Mr. Deltell's question on peremptory challenges.
The Department of Justice representatives told us that this could be used in a discriminatory manner, and that the peremptory challenge had been eliminated in the United Kingdom, for instance. Be that as it may, I am sure that today potential jurors could still be excluded for valid reasons.
What are the reasons why a potential jury member could be excluded, aside from valid causes? What means could a defence lawyer or a prosecutor use if there were no specific grounds to exclude a potential juror? Why is it important to keep that?