By the way, we participated in this particular approach for the Australian government. We submitted a brief on all these issues, and we were pleased that the Australian government introduced the concept of what they call “shared parental responsibility”.
We already know there are cases where parents are satisfied. We already know that from reports we are receiving. Maybe it's not 100%. We already know that, just as we can see in Canada, the Australian government, Australian agencies and government organizations constantly oppose fathers, and men, and raise issues of domestic violence. These are obstacles in the way of parents to achieve equality in parenting.
We already know it's working for all the cases that want it to be, because the parents still have that option, by the way. They are not completely restricted to take it equally. We can vary the time, and we vary the responsibilities. They can always share all of that. This is already included in the law. You can adjust it as much as you want. It doesn't have to be fifty-fifty. It doesn't have to be ten-ninety or forty-sixty. The way we have it right now is, well, I'm not going to pass the 40% mark because of the issue of child support.
I want to mention one more thing about the issue of poverty, by the way. The poverty that we're claiming, let's trade it for parents looking after their children, rather than having to look after their children 100% of the time so they don't have time to work. If we allow them that opportunity, the parent who is the poorest, let's say, can go and find a job and allow the other parent to share the responsibility for taking care of the child. This is one issue we need to carefully look at to resolve. That could resolve the issues of child support altogether and the complications around it.