Honestly, the intention was just to take what we heard and to take the wording that existed in the code and apply it to this section.
Mr. Davies, I think, raised a good point. My point in drawing the distinction between proposed paragraphs (a) and (b) is that I can imagine a court wanting to make an interim order to prevent an accused—pending conviction and pending trial—from owning an animal if there is a serious offence and a prima facie basis for doing so.
There's no great intention, other than that it made sense to copy and paste, but copying and pasting appears to be more complicated than that.