Indeed. I know you have concerns with the bill. That's why we had spoken on the phone. Part of the issue you have is that you believe private members have no business putting forward private members' bills with respect to amending the Criminal Code. I know that amendments that have been made in the past, perhaps, are not to your liking.
What is wrong with a private member suggesting a reasonable change to the Criminal Code, a change that would strengthen Canadian law through the enshrinement of human rights principles in the Criminal Code? That is the intent and spirit of what I'm doing. What's wrong with a private member acting in that way? I suppose you would prefer subjects like heritage days, and they have their place, but I prefer to do something a little more ambitious. What's wrong with that?