I agree with Professor Hogg.
I suppose the closest equivalent would be in the context of hate speech, in that Parliament has acted to prohibit the willful promotion of hatred through the passage of subsection 319(2) of the Criminal Code. That is hate speech directed at identifiable groups. The Canadian Human Rights Act used to have a provision addressing hate speech as well. A number of provincial human rights codes have provisions dealing with the civil consequences of hate speech. For example, in the Saskatchewan human rights code, there's a prohibition on hate speech in section 14.
There's an example of the Supreme Court of Canada upholding those various provisions, most recently in the Whatcott v. Saskatchewan decision from a few years ago. The court described hate speech as discriminatory speech or speech that has discriminatory effects. We can think of hate speech as a branch of discrimination law in that sense. They've upheld the provincial provision and of course they've upheld subsection 319(2) of the Criminal Code in the Keegstra case and other decisions. That's an example of an area where there's room for an overlap between criminal prohibitions passed by Parliament and prohibitions in provincial human rights codes.