The jurisprudence is replete with tensions between labour law and human rights regimes, and by adopting this statute, which will modify both at the same time, there are possibilities that there will be tensions between those two regimes, and there will be questions as to which is the best path to follow for a claimant. Should that person go through the labour system and arbitration and so on? Or should that person go through the human rights system? Oftentimes, the different systems come up with completely different types of jurisprudence. Right? And the standards will be different.
Mind you, the first part, if it's criminal law, the standard will be proof beyond a reasonable doubt, which is quite something if you're actually looking to eradicate some...if you're thinking in terms of civil rights issues. So I agree with the minister. I think that there is a problem or a political issue to think about in terms of how that will work in practice. I'm not sure it's wise to keep both tracks at the same time.