Yes, there is case law under section 9 as well. It is referred to in my paper at footnote 3. There are two cases. One is a case called Hufsky. It was a random stop at a checkpoint and the court held that, yes, that's an arbitrary detention, but because the idea of the checkpoint was to check licensing, insurance, and sobriety, it was justified under section 1. The other case is Ladouceur, which was a random stop not at a checkpoint but on a routine patrol by a police officer. That was a more individualized choice, which I know is a matter of concern to Mr. Rankin. That one was upheld as well on the grounds that, yes, it was an arbitrary detention, but because the purpose was road safety, it was justified under section 1.
On September 18th, 2017. See this statement in context.