In proposed subsection 320.12, it talks about determination of what decides whether someone is impaired or not. In terms of alcohol, it's basically by means of an approved instrument. However, when it comes to a drug, it says an evaluation conducted by an evaluating officer is a reliable method of determining whether someone is impaired.
Does that give you any privacy concerns, that the officer's opinion is going to be a valid measure of whether someone is impaired or not, and then will lead to the next step?