I did not mention it. I should have mentioned it in terms of issues that will be subject to challenge in the litigation process, and that will slow the process and the court process down.
I have less of a difficulty with the mandatory breath testing than the mandatory blood testing challenge, mainly because it's a less intrusive process. When you're actually removing a blood sample from someone, there are a lot of uses to which that blood can be put that might not be strictly connected with sobriety or whatever.
We don't have a very strong position on it, except that we would worry about ensuring that the due process rights of those who are subject to it are protected.