You're at the tail end of the criminal justice system, right? Criminal justice starts where the disturbance happens and we engage the police. The police are of course concerned about things like freedom of expression. They don't want to infringe on people's ability to object, to dissent, and to share opinions that are different from those of other people.
If the House of Commons sends a signal by saying, look, we're going to remove section 176 because religious worship doesn't deserve this special protection, then I submit that it certainly signals to police and so on that they're going to have to tolerate dissent within religious services, whether that's loud and boisterous shouting and chanting or a silent protest in the middle of a worship service with posters or flags or what have you. They're going to have to sit by and allow some time to lapse, like they do with the university lectures. It's not that long ago that I was in university myself, where I've seen that kind of thing happen.