Right.
I had challenged other witnesses on this, so perhaps you can think about it and in the interests of time, submit an answer following this that we can consider. Subsection 278.3(5) talks about a 60-day notice period, but that has to do with an application for production of records. Those are records that are not in the possession of the accused. That's completely different from subsection 278.93(4), which deals with the specific hearing, where if the accused has documents in his possession, that he would have to make an application. It doesn't prevent him from waiting until after the crown's case.
Anyway, I just throw that out there because I'd heard that misstated by other witnesses that we'd had before our committee and I think it's an important point.