I appreciate the attempt here, but, first of all, with regard to “officiant”, I don't think there's a hard time understanding what that means, especially when it's in the context of “an officiant from celebrating a religious or spiritual service”. The definition is there, and what follows the word “officiant”.... I mean, we are talking about the difference between an “official” and an “officiant”. I believe it is clear in what it says. I believe Canadians would understand what that means.
Rather than trying to play around with all the words in CPC-2, my take is that I will vote against CPC-2 in favour of LIB-2, which doesn't require all of these amendments.