I also appreciate the attempts to bring everything into line, but I agree with Mr. Fraser.
There is more wording in this amendment. There are more wording differences than just that. Also, in amended 176(2), I don't think we need to have it in there at all. I think the original proposed subsection is broader, or at least as broad.
On balance, after hearing all of the excellent arguments, I'm going to support Mr. Fraser's motion.