I would just add that with regard to the cases with systemic implications, the program as it's currently structured has panels who are appointed by members of the community. They have legitimacy in the grassroots community as people who are able to select cases that have that systemic implication. The program has the capacity to do that. It's been doing it since it was founded. The structure does that.
Venturing into the provincial realm, the program as it is has the expertise to decipher which cases ought to be funded based on national importance. The CCD does it in its own interventions. We only intervene in cases that we feel, given our limited resources, will have a national impact. The court challenges program has made that assessment with its scarce resources, and has the capacity to do that. Expanding to the provincial sphere will not be a problem.