I can, as long as we remember there are 14 districts. For instance, I'm sitting in Melbourne, in a purpose-built building that was commissioned in 2002, and it is a perfect environment for jurors. As you suggest, they have a separate entrance. There's a lounge. They're given security cards as employees, so they can get in the building, clear security, get on a lift, go up to the floor they're required to go to, and enter the deliberation room they're required to go to. It's well set out.
At the other end of the spectrum, we have courthouses that were built at the turn of the last century, where we don't even have a jury pool room. The pool will gather under a tree and then be brought into the courtroom, so there are varying degrees.
We're currently in Shepparton, which is a couple of hours out of Melbourne. It's a regional court. The government has invested around $70 million to build a new multi-purpose courthouse that will have two trial courts, so there are two courtrooms that could cater for jury trials. I sit on that steering committee, and a lot of thought and effort has gone into building a purpose-built environment for jurors.
I'll just make a couple of comments, if I may, on what previous people have said. Our judges, certainly on longer trials, will build in breaks, and I just have to stress again that we have a front-end system whereby the personal hardship issues never get into a courtroom.
The third thing I'll say is—and it doesn't matter if you're the CEO of BHP or not—your employer is obliged to make up your pay to what you would have expected to be paid had you not been on jury service. Our system has really catered for those personal stresses, not necessarily the stress related to the horrific details of the trial, but in the sense that those other personal circumstances never get into a courtroom.