It's a little better but it's still inadequate.
I think that if politicians want to take this legislation seriously in terms of how it would work for clinical practitioners, what they need to do is put this part of the legislation on pause and convene a panel of experts in the area of gender dysphoria so they can come up with a proposed consensus guideline as to what exactly constitutes “exploration”.
Failing that, the ambiguity will create a lot of anxiety.