PV-1 indicates “which includes”, so it's not limited to the list that follows. It includes the list plus whatever needs to be added to the list.
The same goes for LIB-2, which indicates “assault law and social context, which includes systemic racism and systemic discrimination”. That could possibly be understood to include—but it's not excluding—what's proposed by NDP-1.
If the committee wants to have a more comprehensive definition, I suggest they do it in NDP-1, put aside PV-1 and LIB-2 and try to come to an agreement on what the definition could be, but that's up to the committee to decide.
The way we see it, the three are not mutually exclusive, but if there is a will to have a definition at one place in the bill, that's up to the committee to decide.