Well, to your point, Mr. Maloney, the situation is exemplified by a recent trial that was done by Zoom, a public trial in the civil justice system, Fabrizi v. Chu, and there was a huge issue of credibility. Who saw what? Who recalled better? The case was 12 years old when it was heard.
Whether or not there's an appeal on that, as in any case involving credibility, the issues of credibility really are for the trier of fact who saw and heard the witness. The appeal court, as you know, is only going to review a transcript. There's not going to be a change in the practice that somehow they get to see a recording of the original witnesses, because the trial judge is always in a better position to deal with that issue, but appeals will continue—