I agree with Ms. Conlon on her description of Nova Scotia.
I'm not sure the analogy to the regulation of judges is the appropriate analogy. The function of law societies is to promote the public interest in the practice of law. Just because they don't necessarily make their processes transparent is not necessarily the reason the CJC should make its processes transparent.
Again, if we're trying to think about the larger values we're trying to promote, there is also significant public dissatisfaction and a lack of public confidence in how law societies regulate, so I'm not sure an awful lot of light is captured by looking to what law societies do in this regard.
Could I take a quick second to respond to the previous question? It was around the judicial review question.