I would simply say that we agree with The Advocates' Society that appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal would be a good move.
The only clarification I would make, though, is that there's a nuance in this. If you look carefully at proposed subsection 146(2), which deals with the fees that are paid, it says:
no payments to lawyers representing judges are to be made in respect of any judicial review of any decision made under this Division
This seems to acknowledge that perhaps there in fact could still be a judicial review process. The legislation tries to exclude the possibility of judicial review. I think it is also implicitly acknowledging that it could still happen through this process. Maybe, given the Federal Court of Appeal's decisions in recent years, it's saying that the Canadian Judicial Council cannot exclude judicial review.
That is a nuance. However, basically we are in support of the position advanced by The Advocates' Society. I'll stop there.