You are entirely correct; that is one of the difficulties.
Often, what the Barreau du Québec says in parliamentary committees is that even if we agree on the purpose of the provision of a bill, it has to be implemented effectively and efficiently, it has to work, and the necessary tools have to exist. If we are not able to ensure that those tools are present, to ensure the proper conduct of a whole host of proceedings relating to the administration of justice, Parliament should perhaps specify, in the factors that must be assessed, that there must be sufficient guarantees in relation to the technology, for example.