Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
I thank the witnesses for being with us today.
Madam Diab started a line of questioning that I want to follow up on. If I read the bill correctly, I think that in all but one section, using video conference or audio conference requires the consent of both the prosecutor and the accused.
I think you rightly identified that in clause 46 the new section 715.241 has one exception: If someone is in custody, they can be required to participate by video conference if no witness testimony has been taken and if they have private access to counsel.
Is that also your understanding of the bill?