Okay.
Knowing people who work in the justice system, I'm curious to understand, though, how the requirement for a hearing to take place within a reasonable period of time comes up against what may be the resource realities on the ground. You can say there's an obligation to have a hearing take place within a certain period of time, but if there are competing obligations that a particular court of appeal and a particular province are facing, that's still going to have an effect on the timeline.
What is the effect if there is an obligation but there is a failure to realize that obligation?