I see. This isn't easy, obviously. This is a complex area, so I appreciate your distilling this. I think that if I had moved such an amendment, I'm not sure that this subtlety would have resonated with me, and if you'll allow me for a second, I just want to try to wrap my head around it.
What would be the impact if NDP-1 were to say, “Despite paragraph 3(a) or 3(b)”? What would that then do?