We've heard some very contradictory lines from the Liberal government on this in the course of our committee's work. The justice minister said that there is no redefinition, this is simply codifying the definition that exists in the Supreme Court jurisprudence, despite the change in language. Earlier, in today's meeting, Ms. Lattanzio had said to the contrary that Parliament has to draw the line there, so that indicates that there is a new line being drawn and not the one that is on the Supreme Court.
Just to confirm, is your position that the justice minister's claim that what is in Bill C-9 defining hate constitutes just a replication and a codification of existing jurisprudence? Is you position that this is a misrepresentation of his own bill?