It doesn't surprise me. It's very disappointing. In addition to what you described in your opening statement, in terms of the request for clarification, there really could have been an easy answer to this. Simply defining the hakenkreuz, the Nazi swastika, and that it does not relate to symbolism in your faith, could have been an easy answer. The government chose not to do that.
Is there anything else about this particular bill? There's another aspect of this bill about a symbol that closely resembles a symbol that's described in (a) and (b) and likely to be confused with that symbol. How is that going to impact your religion?