The way the bill is constructed right now, it's important to include reference to terror symbols, to clarify that those are indeed symbols of hate targeting communities, but I don't know if it meaningfully changes the challenge that the Ontario situation I mentioned in my remarks brought forward, which was that it was impossible for the Crown, in their estimation, to prove hateful intent on top of the display of those terror symbols. It's our position that the symbols of a listed terrorist entity are inherently hateful. They're inherently symbols of hateful violence, and they should be addressed outright.
The promotion of terrorism that we have seen that's driving radicalization, violence and extremism across this country needs to be addressed. That can be done in a straightforward way through the inclusion of a wilful promotion of terrorism provision that mirrors the other provisions. We've decided as a country—