I'm happy to provide those in writing to make things faster.
The challenge that we've faced in terms of the status quo is that cases will be brought forward where it's clear something criminal has taken place, and then they disappear. We don't know if there's a timeline for them to be considered. We don't know what considerations are being undertaken. There's no communication, no transparency and no process.
It's very difficult to retain confidence in a justice system where a plausible crime has been committed and there are no answers for how that's going to be addressed. We need to fundamentally change that dynamic. We need to make sure that when somebody is allegedly promoting hatred there is a clear path forward to have that addressed, have that considered and move that forward.
If we can't align on that, then we need to look at alternatives like removing Attorney General consent but retaining it for private prosecution to ensure that we don't have an onslaught of vexatious prosecutions that overwhelm the system.
