I'll just say that the jurisprudence is clear that the religion defence cannot be used, as a Trojan Horse, to allow otherwise hateful speech to come through, and yet we don't see any prosecutions moving forward with this. That's something that needs to be addressed. We need to find the right balance to ensure that legitimate religious expression is not coming under attack but, at the same time, that the auspices of religious speech are not being abused to advance hateful rhetoric and incite hatred against people here all across the country.
