That's a good question.
We believe that the process is flawed. Our role—and we have not reviewed every single entity that's on the terrorist entities list—is to determine whether or not they should be there.
One example I could give is that FARC, in Colombia, was previously a revolutionary force engaged in violent activities and is now part of a peace process, yet remains listed on the terrorist entities list. We think that's part of the flaw in the fact that it's difficult for organizations to challenge it, because the evidence is kept secret and the decision-making process itself is secretive
We think that administrative listing processes are the problem. The government can determine whether or not there should be sanctions against certain organizations for the activities they undertake, including organizations they deem to be terrorist organizations, but we are deeply concerned around how the listing process itself works.