Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I want to be crystal clear from the onset. Every member of this committee shares the same goal of protecting children from exploitation and ensuring that offenders face the toughest possible penalties. There is absolutely no ambiguity on that point.
However, we also have a duty to act responsibly. The notwithstanding clause is an extraordinary measure that overrides charter rights. It has never been used by a federal government, and it should not be used as a political reaction to a court decision, no matter how strongly we feel about the outcome.
There's one amendment to Mr. Brock's motion. Our amendment is to make this motion stronger and more constructive. I will circulate that to the clerk in a few minutes.
The amendment keeps the focus exactly where it belongs—on protecting children without undermining the charter or the independence of our courts. We are calling on this government to bring forward legislation to strengthen protections against child sexual exploitation. That's the responsible path. It's firm action rooted in evidence, in respect for the Constitution and in an unwavering commitment to keep our children safe.
Let's be clear. Child sexual exploitation is one of the most horrific crimes imaginable. Those who prey on children are the worst of the worst, and they deserve to face the full force of the law. Our government will always stand firm against those who harm any child.
With that, Mr. Chair, I will be sending over the amendment on the third paragraph of Mr. Brock's motion.