Okay.
I therefore propose to strike the word “incorrectly” in the first paragraph, so it reads as follows: “…mandatory minimum sentences for offences related to child sexual exploitation, and ruled that these mandatory minimum sentences were cruel and unusual”.
I do not think our committee should tell the Supreme Court judges that they made an incorrect ruling. That seems a bit awkward to me. I would remove the word “incorrectly”. It doesn’t change the essence of the motion, but it removes that…
Do you agree, Patricia?