I'll be very brief.
In response to Ms. Lattanzio, this is not a political reaction that you're watching on this side; this is the responsible reaction.
I would like to add that under the circumstances and given the intent of the notwithstanding clause, if it is not to be used to uphold a mandatory minimum sentence against possession of child pornography, then there's no conceivable scenario that I could imagine where it would be appropriate for the Liberal government or, in fact, anyone else to use the notwithstanding clause. This is precisely, as I said in my initial remarks, the type of scenario that the founders and the framers who agreed on the charter have contemplated. I ask again that we don't just think about the kids abused by Senneville and nod. I ask that we create enough deterrence to prevent and save future kids and to kill this disgusting industry.
I will be voting against the Liberal motion to amend.