Thank you, Chair.
My point of order is that her point of order is not a point of order. She didn't mention any standing order. It had nothing to do with the rules. She seems to be complaining about the perspectives of my colleague or aspects of his manner of speech. I suggest she get on the speaking list and comment on it, but her point of order is not an objection regarding the rules, and that's what points of order are. They are interventions in relation to rules and rules not followed, etc. Hers was not a point of order, and I think she should have been stopped much earlier.