If I may, I'm going to answer in English to clarify my point.
Frequently, when courts are trying to determine the risk assessment of who's going to reoffend while on bail, they will look at the past criminal record, because convictions are a good indicator of future behaviour. But in some cases, there could be random violent attacks where the accused doesn't have a prior conviction. There was a concern that some bail courts were not giving weight to the fact that this person might be a danger: There's no pattern here. This person hasn't had a criminal conviction before. This person can be safely released.
The concern with random violent attacks is that it's an indication of unpredictable behaviour. The idea is to just ensure that courts are aware of that concern.