It won't just be a reverse onus, then.
For example, the judge won't ask the accused person—whether they're a man or a woman—to prove that they will appear in court the next time they have to, to prove to the judge that they won't reoffend.
The judge won't necessarily have to intervene like that. If I understand the concept, and correct me if I'm wrong, the onus will be on the accused. It will be up to them to establish that, to be proactive and tell the judge what they're proposing to guarantee that they aren't a danger to public safety, that they will be present at their own trial and so on. That's more or less the idea.
Can you confirm whether I'm right?