Attorney General, in Bill C-48, the government already tried the reverse onus strategy, but that still resulted in catch-and-release, even for offences where bail was sought with a reverse onus.
Wouldn't Canadians be right to be concerned that even though you're expanding the list of offences to which reverse onus bail would apply, the result of this bill, Bill C-14, would be the same as that of Bill C-48, which is the revolving door in our bail system?