That's right. The answer is yes.
The key point here is that what Parliament could choose to do is remove the language from the code. However, with regard to the point you made in your previous question, the principle remains as a result of common law decisions and would continue to be interpreted in a way without the guidance of Parliament.
The correct path, if we have a sense of how bail hearings should operate and how these principles should be applied, is that we should direct the courts with the language that we put into our laws rather than delete it from our laws, knowing the underlying principle remains to be interpreted in a different manner.