Yes.
Again, I will respond in English, for time, because I don't want to talk out the clock.
The initial conversation started with proposals around changing the standard of proof that someone would need to make, but it would create many uncertainties. We wanted to ensure that courts would make a decision based on real information about whether someone poses a public safety threat. That conversation evolved into a new idea that, rather than changing the standard of proof, we would be able to provide reliable information to the court in order to allow the court to make an informed decision.