Look, I'll answer your question slightly differently from how you asked it, only because their reactions started to come in before we released Bill C-14. This was because of the way we engaged. There was pleasant surprise, frankly, in some instances, with the approach we took, because we so sincerely wanted provincial governments to inform the final version of the bill.
I think to myself about the engagements I've had with my Conservative counterpart in Ontario, Attorney General Doug Downey. Many of the ideas, including how we're going to look at a new process for reverse onuses, came from conversations I had with Attorney General Downey. I think about my engagements with Matt Wiebe in Manitoba and the advocacy he put toward, including specific provisions that would deal with attacks against first responders. I think about Niki Sharma insisting, in response to the horrific murder of Bailey McCourt, that we make changes about refusing bail when someone has been convicted pre-sentencing.
Their reaction didn't just follow; it was actually part of the process. They appreciated that engagement. When we included that feedback in the version of the bill we presented in the House of Commons, they didn't just say nice things in public; in some instances, they asked to be present at press conferences to feature some of the elements that they had advocated to be included in the bill.
To answer your question summarily, it's been a uniquely positive reaction.