As I understand the motion, all of the offences that are listed in proposed paragraph (d) are offences that are found in part III of the Criminal Code.
If I take subsection 95(1), for example, possession of a prohibited or restricted firearm, loaded or easily loaded, that offence has been interpreted by the courts to apply to situations where somebody who has a licence to possess the firearm possesses it in a place they're not authorized. They're authorized to possess it in their house, but they keep it at their cottage, for example.
There are other offences—if I understand Mr. Fortin's objective here—that exist in the Criminal Code and relate to firearms or the use of firearms. For example, section 85, “Using firearm in commission of offence”, is another part III offence.
However, then you can look to other parts of the Criminal Code, like subsection 244(1) and subsection 244.2(1), which describe use offences, in which you discharge a firearm at somebody, intending to cause bodily harm.
On a quick scan, I can see that there are some offences that are not included there.
