The reason I bring that up is that we have.... Of course, the offences that were at issue in Senneville, on child sexual exploitation and abuse material.... The problem here is that we already have cases where judges are finding, as in the Senneville case, that even one year is cruel and unusual punishment.
What consideration was given, as this bill was being crafted, to ways to prevent this from being basically a way for judges who don't believe in mandatory minimums to simply ignore them if they don't want to impose them?