Exactly. If we go to what exactly you have proposed in Bill C-16, you're essentially restoring the mandatory minimums, but you're giving the court flexibility in a case where one of these reasonable hypotheticals is brought before the court, because nobody can be sure, no matter how long someone has been a prosecutor, that no prosecutor would ever bring such a case. You're ensuring that the court will likely agree that the way the law is drafted is reasonable. It's a reasonable limit on a freedom that is subject to the notwithstanding clause because the court has the discretion in this rare case to impose a lesser sentence.
