One historical development piece of this bill that's important to understand is that the Senneville decision arrived as we were preparing the content of the bill. We made the decision to respond, and we thought it best to address the issue of mandatory minimums that existed today that were baked into the code previously, including those that remain in the code and those that were struck down. We didn't do a full-blown consultation either about provisions that had been removed by Parliament or about those that could potentially be added or removed from a mandatory minimum regime.
If that's an issue this committee would like to study to provide guidance, I would welcome that guidance, but it would be important to actually conduct that consultation.