For the benefit of my colleagues, I think Ms. Kim is referring to proposed paragraph 15(2)(b) in the bill. Specifically, it's the last part, which mentions that the person is depicted as being exposed, and it says, “if the depiction is likely to be mistaken for a visual recording of that person.” I think the French version of the same section is similar.
I would go even further. I would suggest that you can have an unrealistic depiction of a person that is perhaps used in a perverted fashion. For instance, one might have qualities that are not human qualities, and at the same time they could be depicted in a sexual fashion.
I agree with you 100%, Ms. Kim. How would you suggest that we fix it literally? You still have to refer to the identity of the victim here. Maybe you're not able to answer that question now, but I certainly invite you to email my office with any technical suggestions. If you have an answer now, that would be great.