When we look at the way we're trying to protect those, hopefully, in the course of our work on Bill C-16, I just want to point out that in the Senneville decision, which triggered this part, we actually saw at the lower court level a judge go below the mandatory minimum sentence and give an offender, who had possessed hundreds of videos and images of children as young as, I believe, four, a 90-day sentence.
From your perspective, when we already had a mandatory minimum in place and that decision came down, how can we stop that, moving forward?