Yes. The CBA actually supports many of the proposed refinements to those kinds of provisions. We actually indicate in our brief, in considerable detail—probably in more detail than is useful for me to get into my response today—that perhaps there are some ways in which it may not capture certain kinds of images that might be, for example, of a fictitious or an imaginary animal, and bestiality. We actually make some suggestions to refine those amendments further to capture some certain other types of scenarios.
