I'd like to comment on this.
I cited earlier the comments from the minister on this. May I ask whether you considered those in making your decision?
What's happening now is that you are making rulings that.... Our attempt is to do what the minister claims this bill is supposed to do, which is restore mandatory minimums to the Criminal Code. You're making that impossible by not even allowing debate or a vote on these. It would be helpful to know what you relied on in reaching this series of out-of-scope declarations.