I don't believe so. I think the main concern is that the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act contains a trafficking offence, which of course can be committed for a sexual purpose. The intention here is to ensure that that victim gets the same protection of the law.
Let's say police decide to proceed with section 118—that's the human trafficking offence in IRPA—and not the Criminal Code offence. The victim would not receive the protection of the law unless this amendment is enacted. That is the purpose of it. What it's reined in by and what provides safeguards is the tests. You have to have an offence of a sexual nature or an offence committed for a sexual purpose in order for the provisions to apply. I've already explained to the committee what that term means.
